Comparison, October 2026

Salt, Ansible, Puppet, and Chef, compared

Four mature configuration-management engines, four different trade-offs. They differ on agents, Windows, speed at scale, and licensing as of 2026, and where Gardience fits: a supported console, compliance, and change-control layer on open-source Salt for mixed Windows and Linux fleets.

Start your free 90-day trialBook a 15-minute demoSee the comparison

Comparing tools? Skip the sales cycle.

See it, get a plan with pricing, or try it on your own machines. Choose one:

See it in 15 minutes

Pick a time. We walk through a live Windows and Linux fleet, your questions first.

Pick a time

Get a pilot plan

Your work email is all we need. Within one business day: a pilot plan for your fleet, answers to the security questions your team will ask, and pricing.

Try it yourself

Free for 90 days on up to 25 machines, no credit card. Installs in 4 to 5 minutes on one Linux server.

Start free trial

Gardience vs Ansible Automation Platform, SUSE Multi-Linux Manager, and Tanzu Salt

Published list prices for 1,000 servers a year, seen October 2026: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Premium $192,500 (AWS Marketplace), Progress Chef Enterprise $189,000, SUSE Multi-Linux Manager $134,000 for Linux virtual machines only, and Gardience Team $15,000, flat, Windows and Linux included. See every price, with sources.

In plain numbers: at 1,000 servers, Ansible Automation Platform Premium lists at nearly 13 times the price of Gardience, and SUSE Multi-Linux Manager at nearly 9 times, for Linux alone. Against AAP that is $177,500 a year back in your budget, or $532,500 over three years. Both bill per node, every year, so the cost climbs with every server you add. Gardience is priced per fleet: adding servers inside your tier costs nothing.

GardienceAnsible Automation PlatformSUSE Multi-Linux ManagerTanzu Salt
Price, 1,000 servers a year$15,000 flat, Windows and Linux$192,500 (Premium, AWS Marketplace list)$134,000 (Linux VMs only, SUSE store list)No public price; sold within VMware Cloud Foundation
How it is pricedPer fleet; growth inside a tier is free, see every price with sourcesPer node, every year, in 100-node packsPer managed system or socket pairContract; support ends October 2028
Speed at scaleLive connection to every server: 1,020 servers patched in 13 minutes in one approved runConnects per run; large fleets go in parallel batchesAgent-based (Salt); scheduled actionsAgent-based (Salt)
Windows and Linux in one consoleYesYes (Windows over WinRM or SSH)Linux only; Windows support was closed as "not planned" upstreamYes
Patch and compliance reportingBuilt in: pending updates, security baseline (STIG and CIS aligned) and drift for every machine, with evidence packsThrough playbooks and add-onsYes, for LinuxYes
Vulnerabilities (CVEs)Built in for Debian, Ubuntu, the Red Hat family, and Windows: every CVE with the machines it reaches and whether a fix is waiting; Fix a CVE installs only that CVE's updates on only the exposed machines, with approval; alerts for new CVEs; import a scanner's CSV exportThrough Red Hat Lightspeed (formerly Insights) for connected RHEL systems: a CVE list and remediation playbooksCVE Audit for its Linux clients, based on OVAL data since 5.2Tanzu Salt Vulnerability: its own assessment, or an imported Tenable, Rapid7, or Qualys scan, then remediation
Change controlApprovals with a two-person rule, change windows, locks, change-ticket checks (ServiceNow, Jira)Workflow approvalsAction chains and schedulingRole-based access
Audit trailTamper-evident hash-chained log, forwarded to your SIEMActivity streamEvent historyActivity log
Runs existing Ansible playbooksYes, over the Salt connection, no WinRM or SSH keys neededYesYes, through an Ansible control nodeNo
Package repositoriesUses the update sources you already have: vendor repositories, an internal mirror, Red Hat Satellite, SUSE RMT, or Multi-Linux Manager, or WSUS. Keep them for content; Gardience runs everything elseA separate product, Red Hat SatelliteBuilt in: channels and content lifecycleUses your existing repositories
Air-gapped installYes: signed offline bundle, one commandYesYesYes
TerraformProvider for Terraform and OpenTofu: machines join and get their state on first boot (join rules), groups, saved states, and event rules as code, and machines leave the fleet on destroyOfficial provider for running Automation Platform job templates and inventories from TerraformNo provider in the public registries; a community prototype was shown at openSUSE Conference 2025No provider documented
Event-driven automationBuilt in, no YAML: restart stopped services, warn on full disks, configure new machines as they join; every firing auditedEvent-Driven Ansible (rulebooks reacting to outside events, then running playbooks)Salt reactors and beacons, configured by handSalt reactors and beacons
AI assistantBuilt in and supported: plain English to a checked runbook, command, or state that a person approves and runs; answers questions about the fleet from live data (read-only, off until an admin turns it on); a daily briefing with suggested actions; an MCP server for your own agents; Claude, OpenAI, or any OpenAI-compatible model, including one you host inside an air-gapped network; no extra license or platform to buyLightspeed intelligent assistant, generally available on OpenShift with a model hosted on Red Hat AI; its MCP server in technology previewAn MCP server, in technology previewNo assistant documented

Where Gardience fits

Gardience is not a fifth engine. It is open-source Salt, hardened and tested release by release, with the console, compliance, and change control that enterprises need on top, and support behind it. It manages Windows and Linux in one place, it runs the Ansible playbooks you already have, so you do not have to rewrite them, and its built-in AI assistant turns plain English into the exact Salt work, which runs only when a person approves it. And it costs a fraction of the per-node platforms: $15,000 a year for 1,000 Windows and Linux servers, flat.

The engines at a glance

SaltAnsiblePuppetChef
How it reaches machinesAgent (minion) on a persistent encrypted ZeroMQ connection; agentless mode via salt-sshAgentless, over SSH (Linux) and WinRM or SSH (Windows)Agent that pulls its configuration on a schedule (every 30 minutes by default)Agent that pulls its configuration on a schedule
WindowsNative Windows agentSupported through WinRM or SSHNative Windows agentNative Windows agent
How you write itYAML states with Jinja; Python for extensionsYAML playbooksPuppet's own declarative languageRuby-based recipes
Speed at scaleEvent bus: a command reaches thousands of connected machines in seconds, results stream back livePush per run; large fleets are split into parallel batchesConverges each machine on its next check-inConverges each machine on its next check-in
Open source status (2026)Apache 2.0, maintained by the Salt Projectansible-core is GPLv3Since early 2025, new Puppet builds ship from a private repository; production use above 25 nodes needs a commercial license. The community fork is OpenVoxSource is Apache 2.0; Progress Chef's free tier is for personal, non-commercial use, business use needs a commercial license
Commercial editionBroadcom Tanzu Salt (end of support October 2028), or GardienceRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform, priced per nodePuppet Enterprise (Perforce)Progress Chef

Strengths and trade-offs

Salt

Strengths
  • Fast at fleet scale: persistent connections and a live event bus
  • Reacts to events (a stopped service, a changed file) automatically
  • Strong Windows support with a native agent
Trade-offs
  • An agent to install and keep healthy on every machine
  • Smaller ecosystem than Ansible
  • Salt's free tools have no compliance reporting, approvals, or audit trail

Ansible

Strengths
  • Nothing to install on managed machines
  • The largest collection ecosystem and the easiest to learn
  • Great for provisioning and one-off orchestration
Trade-offs
  • Every run opens new connections, so large fleets are slower
  • Windows depends on WinRM or SSH being configured and reachable
  • The supported platform is priced per node, every year

Puppet

Strengths
  • Mature model-driven configuration with strong drift correction
  • Large library of modules for common software
Trade-offs
  • Its own language to learn
  • Changes land on the next agent check-in, not on demand
  • Licensing changed in 2025: plan for a commercial license or the OpenVox fork

Chef

Strengths
  • Full programming language for complex logic
  • Mature testing tooling (InSpec, Test Kitchen)
Trade-offs
  • Steepest learning curve of the four
  • Business use requires a commercial license
  • Pull-based, like Puppet

When to choose what

Stay where you are if

Your AAP or Multi-Linux Manager bill is not a problem for your budget, or you have a large, healthy Puppet or Chef codebase and the licensing works for you. Switching engines is real work; do it for a reason.

Look at Gardience if

Your Ansible Automation Platform or Multi-Linux Manager renewal is one of the biggest lines in your tools budget, and it grows every time the fleet does. Gardience runs the playbooks you already have, covers Windows and Linux for one flat price, and costs a fraction as much. Also if you run Salt (or Uyuni or Multi-Linux Manager) and need Windows covered too; you need patch and compliance evidence for auditors; or your Tanzu Salt support ends in 2028 and you want to keep your Salt states.

Facts as of October 2026, from each vendor's public documentation and announcements: Broadcom on Tanzu Salt support, Progress Chef licensing, The New Stack on Puppet and OpenVox, Uyuni Windows support issue, Red Hat on the Lightspeed assistant (generally available in 2.6), Red Hat on its MCP server (technology preview in 2.7), SUSE on its MCP server, Red Hat on its Terraform provider, openSUSE Conference 2025: Uyuni with Ansible and Terraform, Red Hat on Lightspeed vulnerability remediation, SUSE on CVE Audit, Broadcom on Tanzu Salt scan imports. Salt, Ansible, Puppet, Chef, SUSE, and Tanzu are trademarks of their respective owners. This comparison is independent, not endorsed by any of them, and features change: check each vendor before you decide. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we will fix it.

Talk to us about your fleet   Read the docs

Evaluating Gardience?Three easy ways:15-minute walkthroughPilot plan by emailStart free